table: be in word split

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hash table
Weight: 0.76
, dining room
Weight: 0.65
, screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, dining table
Weight: 0.74
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, table saw
Weight: 0.64
, sofa
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in word split 1.00
move in word 0.85
be in word 0.85
has shape split 0.84
be used in word 0.83
be in word bad 0.83
jump in word 0.79
overlap in word 0.78
break across pages in word 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(table, be in word split)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(table, move in word)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(table, jump in word)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(table, break across pages in word)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(table, be used in word)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(table, break across pages in word)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(table, jump in word)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(table, break across pages in word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(table, jump in word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(table, break across pages in word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(table, jump in word)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(table, move in word)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(table, be used in word)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(table, move in word)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(table, overlap in word)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(table, be used in word)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(table, overlap in word)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(table, overlap in word)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(table, overlap in word)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(table, move in word)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(table, be used in word)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(table, be in word split)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(table, be in word split) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(table, be in word split)