tablet: be manufactured in wet granulation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be manufactured in wet granulation 1.00
be transported with desiccants 0.79
is enteric coated 0.77
have coated sugar 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(device, be transported with desiccants)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(electronic device, be transported with desiccants)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(electronic device, be transported with desiccants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(device, be transported with desiccants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be transported with desiccants)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(device, be transported with desiccants)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(device, be transported with desiccants)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(electronic device, be transported with desiccants)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(tablet, have coated sugar)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(tablet, have coated sugar)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tablet, have coated sugar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(tablet, is enteric coated)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tablet, have coated sugar)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tablet, is enteric coated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(tablet, is enteric coated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is enteric coated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(electronic device, be transported with desiccants)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(device, be transported with desiccants)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(electronic device, be transported with desiccants)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tablet, be manufactured in wet granulation)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(device, be transported with desiccants)