taco bell: be interested in breakfast opportunity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.72
, mexican food
Weight: 0.70
, food chain
Weight: 0.70
Siblings taco
Weight: 0.38
, burrito
Weight: 0.37
, tamale
Weight: 0.37
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be interested in breakfast opportunity 1.00
serve breakfast in morning 0.79
serving breakfast 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food restaurant, serving breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, serving breakfast)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, serving breakfast)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food restaurant, serving breakfast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, serving breakfast)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(taco bell, be interested in breakfast opportunity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, serving breakfast)