taco bell: getting rid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.72
, mexican food
Weight: 0.70
, food chain
Weight: 0.70
Siblings taco
Weight: 0.38
, burrito
Weight: 0.37
, tamale
Weight: 0.37
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
getting rid 1.00
get rid 0.96
keep getting 0.84
get rid of straws 0.81
get rid of plastic straws 0.78
have getting destroyed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant, get rid of straws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(taco bell, getting rid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(food chain, have getting destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(taco bell, getting rid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(food chain, have getting destroyed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(restaurant, get rid of straws)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have getting destroyed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, get rid of straws)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant, get rid of straws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(taco bell, getting rid)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(food chain, have getting destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(taco bell, getting rid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(taco bell, getting rid)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(taco bell, get rid)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(taco bell, get rid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(taco bell, get rid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(taco bell, keep getting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(taco bell, keep getting)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(taco bell, keep getting)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, get rid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, keep getting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, getting rid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(taco bell, getting rid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(food chain, have getting destroyed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(restaurant, get rid of straws)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(food chain, have getting destroyed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(taco bell, getting rid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(restaurant, get rid of straws)