taco bell: is successful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.72
, mexican food
Weight: 0.70
, food chain
Weight: 0.70
Siblings taco
Weight: 0.38
, burrito
Weight: 0.37
, tamale
Weight: 0.37
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is successful 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is successful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food chain, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is successful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(food chain, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is successful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(food chain, is successful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, is successful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, is successful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is successful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is successful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is successful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food chain, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is successful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(food chain, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(taco bell, is successful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is successful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(food chain, is successful)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food chain, is successful)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is successful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(food chain, is successful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food chain, is successful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is successful)