tactics: be important in badminton

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.50
, game
Weight: 0.45
Siblings guerrilla warfare
Weight: 0.30
, chess game
Weight: 0.30
, rhetoric
Weight: 0.29
, trick
Weight: 0.29
, campaign
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in badminton 1.00
be important in netball 0.81
be important in sport 0.77
be important in basketball 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(tactics, be important in badminton)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tactics, be important in netball)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tactics, be important in sport)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tactics, be important in basketball)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tactics, be important in basketball)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tactics, be important in sport)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tactics, be important in basketball)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tactics, be important in netball)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tactics, be important in netball)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tactics, be important in basketball)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tactics, be important in netball)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(tactics, be important in sport)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tactics, be important in sport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tactics, be important in badminton)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tactics, be important in badminton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tactics, be important in badminton)