tail: be cut off dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, bone
Weight: 0.55
Siblings nose
Weight: 0.34
, fin
Weight: 0.32
, upper arm
Weight: 0.32
, arm
Weight: 0.32
, leg
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cut off dogs 1.00
have dogs 0.85
has state cut 0.78
be useful for dogs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(tail, be cut off dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(tail, have dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(tail, have dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tail, have dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tail, be useful for dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tail, has state cut)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(tail, has state cut)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tail, has state cut)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tail, be useful for dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tail, has state cut)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tail, be useful for dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tail, have dogs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tail, be useful for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tail, be cut off dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tail, be cut off dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tail, be cut off dogs)