tail: be important for animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, bone
Weight: 0.55
Siblings nose
Weight: 0.34
, fin
Weight: 0.32
, upper arm
Weight: 0.32
, arm
Weight: 0.32
, leg
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for animals 1.00
be useful for dogs 0.85
have dogs 0.82
keep animals balanced 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tail, be important for animals)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tail, be useful for dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tail, have dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(tail, have dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(tail, have dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tail, keep animals balanced)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tail, keep animals balanced)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tail, be useful for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tail, be useful for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tail, keep animals balanced)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tail, be useful for dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tail, have dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tail, keep animals balanced)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tail, be important for animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tail, be important for animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tail, be important for animals)