take: be in vegas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.53
, person
Weight: 0.52
, rule
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings do
Weight: 0.31
, come
Weight: 0.31
, home run
Weight: 0.31
, try
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in vegas 1.00
is nyc 0.77
is florence 0.76
is chicago 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(take, be in vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(take, be in vegas)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(take, be in vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(take, is florence)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(take, be in vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(take, is florence)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(take, be in vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(take, is florence)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(take, be in vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(take, is florence)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(take, be in vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(take, is nyc)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(take, be in vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(take, be in vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(take, be in vegas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(take, be in vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(take, be in vegas)