talent: be in drivers evaluated

Related concepts

Parents	quality Weight: 0.64 , asset Weight: 0.64 , factor Weight: 0.62 , resource Weight: 0.61
Siblings	star Weight: 0.67 , creativity Weight: 0.64 , athletics Weight: 0.62 , programmer Weight: 0.59 , entertainer Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in drivers evaluated	1.00
be in drivers	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(talent, be in drivers evaluated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(talent, be in drivers evaluated)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(talent, be in drivers evaluated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(talent, be in drivers)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(talent, be in drivers evaluated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(talent, be in drivers)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(talent, be in drivers evaluated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(talent, be in drivers)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(talent, be in drivers evaluated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(talent, be in drivers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(talent, be in drivers evaluated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(talent, be in drivers evaluated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(talent, be in drivers evaluated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(talent, be in drivers evaluated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(talent, be in drivers evaluated)