talk: be used to get information

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents talk show
Weight: 0.72
, show
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings think
Weight: 0.35
, remember
Weight: 0.34
, chat
Weight: 0.34
, game show
Weight: 0.33
, what
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to get information 1.00
be motivated by give information 0.91
causes obtain information 0.90
be motivated by you need that information 0.88
be motivated by use information late 0.87
causes gain new information 0.86
be used to share information 0.85
be used to process information 0.85
be motivated by share information 0.83
causes share information 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to process information)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(remember, be motivated by use information late)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(remember, be motivated by you need that information)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(remember, be motivated by use information late)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(remember, be motivated by use information late)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(think, be used to process information)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(think, be used to process information)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(talk, be used to get information)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(talk, causes gain new information)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(talk, be motivated by give information)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk, be motivated by give information)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(talk, causes gain new information)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(talk, causes obtain information)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(talk, be used to share information)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(talk, causes obtain information)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(talk, be used to share information)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(talk, be motivated by share information)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes obtain information)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(talk, be motivated by give information)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(talk, be motivated by share information)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes gain new information)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(talk, causes obtain information)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(talk, be motivated by share information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(talk, be motivated by give information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to share information)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talk, be motivated by share information)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(talk, be used to share information)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talk, causes gain new information)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(talk, be used to get information)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(think, be used to process information)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(remember, be motivated by use information late)