talk: requires be alive

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents talk show
Weight: 0.72
, show
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings think
Weight: 0.35
, remember
Weight: 0.34
, chat
Weight: 0.34
, game show
Weight: 0.33
, what
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires be alive 1.00
be motivated by think be be alive 0.91
be motivated by remain alive 0.87
be used to keep memory alive 0.87
be used to keep our past alive 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(think, be motivated by think be be alive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(remember, be motivated by remain alive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(remember, be used to keep memory alive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(remember, be used to keep our past alive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(think, be motivated by think be be alive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(think, be motivated by think be be alive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(remember, be motivated by remain alive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(remember, be motivated by remain alive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(remember, be used to keep memory alive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(remember, be used to keep memory alive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(remember, be used to keep our past alive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(remember, be used to keep our past alive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(talk, requires be alive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires be alive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(talk, requires be alive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(think, be motivated by think be be alive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(remember, be used to keep our past alive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(remember, be used to keep memory alive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talk, requires be alive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(remember, be motivated by remain alive)