talking: be better than texting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than texting 1.00
is texting 0.95
be phone driving 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(talking, be better than texting)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(talking, is texting)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(talking, is texting)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(talking, is texting)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(talking, is texting)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(talking, be phone driving)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(talking, be phone driving)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(talking, be phone driving)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(talking, be phone driving)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(talking, be better than texting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(talking, be better than texting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(talking, be better than texting)