talking: is easy part

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is easy part 1.00
is difficult 0.80
is hard 0.76
is dificult 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(talking, is easy part)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(behavior, is hard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(talking, is easy part)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(behavior, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(talking, is easy part)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(behavior, is difficult)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(behavior, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(behavior, is difficult)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(behavior, is hard)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(talk, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(talking, is easy part)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(behavior, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(talking, is easy part)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(behavior, is hard)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(talking, is easy part)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(talk, is hard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talk, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(talking, is easy part)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(talking, is difficult)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(talking, is difficult)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(talking, is dificult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talking, is difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(talking, is hard)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(talking, is difficult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(talking, is dificult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(talking, is dificult)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(talking, is hard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(talking, is hard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(talking, is dificult)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(talking, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talking, is easy part)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(talking, is easy part)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(behavior, is difficult)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(behavior, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(talk, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(behavior, is difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(behavior, is hard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(talking, is easy part)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)