talking: is salary taboo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is salary taboo 1.00
is money taboo 0.85
be considered taboo 0.84
be taboo in society 0.82
is death taboo 0.82
has trait taboo 0.81
is openly taboo 0.80
is slightly taboo 0.80
is periods taboo 0.79
be taboo in modern society 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(talking, is salary taboo)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(talking, is death taboo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(talking, is death taboo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(talking, is death taboo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(talking, be considered taboo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(talking, is death taboo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(talking, be considered taboo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(talking, is money taboo)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(talking, has trait taboo)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(talking, is slightly taboo)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(talking, is slightly taboo)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(talking, is money taboo)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(talking, be considered taboo)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(talking, is money taboo)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(talking, is periods taboo)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(talking, is slightly taboo)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(talking, is money taboo)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(talking, is slightly taboo)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(talking, is periods taboo)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(talking, is periods taboo)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, be taboo in society)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(talking, has trait taboo)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(talking, is openly taboo)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(talking, is periods taboo)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(talking, be taboo in modern society)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(talking, be taboo in society)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(talking, is openly taboo)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(talking, be taboo in society)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(talking, be considered taboo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(talking, is openly taboo)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(talking, be taboo in modern society)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(talking, be taboo in society)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(talking, is openly taboo)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(talking, has trait taboo)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(talking, be taboo in modern society)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(talking, be taboo in modern society)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(talking, has trait taboo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(talking, is salary taboo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(talking, is salary taboo)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talking, is salary taboo)