tampa: be at in florida

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in florida 1.00
be a part of florida 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tampa, be at in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tampa, be at in florida)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tampa, be at in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tampa, be a part of florida)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tampa, be at in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tampa, be a part of florida)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(tampa, be at in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(tampa, be a part of florida)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tampa, be at in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tampa, be a part of florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tampa, be at in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tampa, be at in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tampa, be at in florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tampa, be at in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tampa, be at in florida)