:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tan, is famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(burgundy, is famous)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tan, is famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tan, is famous)
Similarity expansion
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tan, is famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(tan, is le famous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(tan, is famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tan, is le famous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tan, is famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tan, is le famous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tan, is famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tan, is le famous)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tan, is famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tan, is famous)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tan, is famous)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(burgundy, is famous)