tan: look good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, color
Weight: 0.60
, tone
Weight: 0.47
, brown
Weight: 0.46
Siblings hair color
Weight: 0.36
, burgundy
Weight: 0.36
, turquoise
Weight: 0.35
, suntan lotion
Weight: 0.35
, gray
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
look good 1.00
look better 0.93
look better in shower 0.82
is nice thing 0.79
is nice 0.79
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(color, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tan, look good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(brown, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tan, look good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tan, look good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tone, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(brown, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(color, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tone, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(brown, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(color, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(color, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tan, look good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(brown, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tan, look good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tan, look good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tan, look good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tan, look better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tan, look better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tan, look better in shower)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tan, look better in shower)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tan, look better in shower)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(tan, look better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tan, look better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tan, look better in shower)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tan, is nice thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tan, is nice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(tan, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tan, is nice)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tan, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tan, is nice thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tan, is nice thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tan, is nice thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tan, is nice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tan, is nice)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tan, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tan, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tan, look good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tan, look good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tone, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(brown, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(color, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tone, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(brown, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(tan, look good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(color, has quality good)