tan: more is recommended than icln

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, color
Weight: 0.60
, tone
Weight: 0.47
, brown
Weight: 0.46
Siblings hair color
Weight: 0.36
, burgundy
Weight: 0.36
, turquoise
Weight: 0.35
, suntan lotion
Weight: 0.35
, gray
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
more is recommended than icln 1.00
more is recommended than icln for etfs 0.94
more is recommended than icln for solar etfs 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tan, more is recommended than icln)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tan, more is recommended than icln for etfs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(tan, more is recommended than icln for solar etfs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tan, more is recommended than icln for etfs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tan, more is recommended than icln for solar etfs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tan, more is recommended than icln for etfs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tan, more is recommended than icln for etfs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tan, more is recommended than icln for solar etfs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tan, more is recommended than icln for solar etfs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tan, more is recommended than icln)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(tan, more is recommended than icln) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tan, more is recommended than icln)