tango: be popular in finland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dance
Weight: 0.76
, modern dance
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, film
Weight: 0.54
, form
Weight: 0.53
Siblings flamenco
Weight: 0.38
, samba
Weight: 0.37
, salsa
Weight: 0.37
, disco
Weight: 0.35
, mazurka
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in finland 1.00
be popular in argentina 0.80
is popular 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dance, is popular)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tango, be popular in finland)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(film, is popular)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tango, be popular in finland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(film, is popular)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dance, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dance, is popular)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(film, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(disco, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(salsa, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(samba, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(flamenco, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dance, is popular)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(film, is popular)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(flamenco, is popular)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(flamenco, is popular)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(samba, is popular)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(samba, is popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(salsa, is popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(salsa, is popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(disco, is popular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(disco, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(tango, be popular in finland)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in argentina)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tango, be popular in argentina)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tango, be popular in argentina)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(tango, be popular in argentina)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tango, is popular)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tango, is popular)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tango, is popular)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tango, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tango, be popular in finland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(film, is popular)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dance, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(flamenco, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(samba, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(disco, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(salsa, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(film, is popular)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(tango, be popular in finland)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dance, is popular)