tank top: be referred to wife beaters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents top
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.60
, clothing
Weight: 0.58
, piece
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tank
Weight: 0.36
, gas tank
Weight: 0.36
, hot spot
Weight: 0.32
, line item
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be referred to wife beaters 1.00
be referred to as wife beaters 1.00
be called wife beaters 0.98
be called wife beater 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tank, be called wife beaters)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tank, be called wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tank, be called wife beaters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tank top, be referred to as wife beaters)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(tank top, be called wife beaters)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tank top, be referred to as wife beaters)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tank top, be called wife beaters)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tank top, be called wife beater)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tank top, be called wife beaters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tank top, be called wife beater)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tank top, be referred to as wife beaters)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tank top, be called wife beaters)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tank top, be referred to as wife beaters)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tank top, be called wife beater)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tank top, be called wife beater)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tank top, be referred to wife beaters)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tank, be called wife beaters)