tank: were built

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.58
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
, weapon
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.57
, hardware
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gas tank
Weight: 0.63
, riser
Weight: 0.42
, tank top
Weight: 0.36
, rocket launcher
Weight: 0.32
, diesel engine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were built 1.00
were developed 0.84
were created 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were created)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tank, were built)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(weapon, were created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were created)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tank, were built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(tank, were built)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tank, were developed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tank, were developed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tank, were created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tank, were created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tank, were created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tank, were developed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tank, were created)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tank, were developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tank, were built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tank, were built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(weapon, were created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(tank, were built)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(weapon, were created)