tanning: is money

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.57
, industry
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, craft
Weight: 0.49
, operation
Weight: 0.45
Siblings tanning lotion
Weight: 0.35
, beauty salon
Weight: 0.33
, suntan lotion
Weight: 0.33
, salon
Weight: 0.33
, tan
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is money 1.00
is good money 0.94
is suddenly money 0.86
is suddenly good money 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tanning, is money)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tanning, is good money)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tanning, is good money)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tanning, is good money)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(tanning, is suddenly good money)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(tanning, is suddenly money)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tanning, is suddenly money)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tanning, is suddenly good money)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tanning, is good money)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tanning, is suddenly good money)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tanning, is suddenly money)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tanning, is suddenly good money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tanning, is suddenly money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tanning, is money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tanning, is money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tanning, is money)