tanzania: have food insecurity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.52
, independent country
Weight: 0.49
, nation
Weight: 0.48
, work
Weight: 0.48
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.28
, central american country
Weight: 0.28
, czech republic
Weight: 0.28
, west germany
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
have food insecurity 1.00
suffer from food insecurity 0.95
is food insecure 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tanzania, have food insecurity)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tanzania, suffer from food insecurity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tanzania, suffer from food insecurity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tanzania, suffer from food insecurity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tanzania, is food insecure)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tanzania, suffer from food insecurity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(tanzania, is food insecure)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is food insecure)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tanzania, is food insecure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tanzania, have food insecurity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tanzania, have food insecurity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tanzania, have food insecurity)