tanzania: is very poor

Related concepts

Parents	country Weight: 0.54 , place Weight: 0.52 , independent country Weight: 0.49 , nation Weight: 0.48 , work Weight: 0.48
Siblings	central african republic Weight: 0.28 , central american country Weight: 0.28 , czech republic Weight: 0.28 , west germany Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is very poor	1.00
is poor	0.90
is poor country	0.86
has quality good	0.78
be very important in kenya	0.77
has quality bad	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(tanzania, is very poor)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(tanzania, is very poor)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(tanzania, is very poor)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(independent country, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(tanzania, is very poor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(independent country, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(country, is poor)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(country, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(independent country, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(country, has quality bad)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(czech republic, is poor)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(central american country, is poor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(tanzania, is very poor)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(tanzania, is very poor)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(tanzania, is very poor)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(independent country, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(tanzania, is very poor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(central american country, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(central american country, is poor)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(central african republic, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor country)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(czech republic, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(czech republic, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(tanzania, is very poor)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(tanzania, is poor)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(tanzania, is poor country)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(tanzania, is poor)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(tanzania, is poor)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(tanzania, is poor country)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(tanzania, is very poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(independent country, has quality bad)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(country, is poor)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(work, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor country)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(czech republic, is poor)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(central american country, is poor)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(country, is poor)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(independent country, has quality bad)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(work, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(tanzania, is very poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)