tap: be at bathtub

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.52
, item
Weight: 0.51
Siblings filter
Weight: 0.32
, monkey wrench
Weight: 0.31
, punch
Weight: 0.31
, pump
Weight: 0.31
, leverage
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bathtub 1.00
be at bathroom 0.78
be used to fill bath with water 0.77
be at basement 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tool, be at basement)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tap, be at bathtub)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tool, be at basement)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at basement)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tool, be at basement)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tap, be at bathtub)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tap, be at bathtub)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(tap, be used to fill bath with water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tap, be at bathroom)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tap, be used to fill bath with water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tap, be at bathroom)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(tap, be at bathroom)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tap, be at bathroom)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(tap, be used to fill bath with water)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tap, be used to fill bath with water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tap, be at bathtub)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tap, be at bathtub)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tool, be at basement)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tap, be at bathtub)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tool, be at basement)