tap: be made of brass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.54
, application
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings filter
Weight: 0.32
, monkey wrench
Weight: 0.31
, punch
Weight: 0.31
, leverage
Weight: 0.31
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of brass 1.00
be made from brass 0.99
be made of metal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tool, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tap, be made of brass)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tool, be made of metal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tool, be made of metal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tool, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(tap, be made of brass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(tap, be made of brass)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tap, be made from brass)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tap, be made from brass)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made from brass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tap, be made from brass)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tap, be made of metal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tap, be made of metal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tap, be made of metal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of brass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tap, be made of brass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tool, be made of metal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(tap, be made of brass)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tool, be made of metal)