tap: be vs hot tap water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.54
, application
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings filter
Weight: 0.32
, monkey wrench
Weight: 0.31
, punch
Weight: 0.31
, leverage
Weight: 0.31
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs hot tap water 1.00
be vs hot tap 0.98
be vs tap water 0.97
be vs tap 0.94
switch between hot water 0.82
is hot 0.79
keep pool water clean 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(filter, keep pool water clean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(filter, keep pool water clean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(filter, keep pool water clean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tap, be vs hot tap water)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tap, be vs hot tap)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tap, be vs hot tap)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tap, be vs hot tap)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tap, is hot)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tap, is hot)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tap, is hot)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tap, be vs hot tap)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tap, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tap, be vs hot tap water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tap, be vs hot tap water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tap, be vs hot tap water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(filter, keep pool water clean)