tap: has physical part left

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.54
, application
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings filter
Weight: 0.32
, monkey wrench
Weight: 0.31
, punch
Weight: 0.31
, leverage
Weight: 0.31
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part left 1.00
be on left 0.83
has physical part tool 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has physical part tool)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has physical part tool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has physical part tool)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tap, has physical part left)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tap, be on left)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tap, be on left)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tap, be on left)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(tap, be on left)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tap, has physical part left)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tap, has physical part left)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tap, has physical part left) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has physical part tool)