:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tool, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tap, stop working)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tool, work)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tool, work)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(filter, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(leverage, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(punch, is work)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(filter, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(filter, work)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tap, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tap, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tap, work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(tap, work)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tool, work)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(leverage, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(punch, is work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(filter, work)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(tap, stop working)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tool, work)