tape dispenser: be used to bathroom wall

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.54
Siblings tape
Weight: 0.37
, duct tape
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.35
, tape measure
Weight: 0.35
, paper clip
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to bathroom wall 1.00
stick paper with wall 0.79
be at kitchen 0.78
be at basement 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(object, be at basement)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(object, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(object, be at kitchen)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(object, be at basement)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(object, be at kitchen)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(object, be at basement)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tape, stick paper with wall)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(object, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(object, be at basement)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(tape, stick paper with wall)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tape, stick paper with wall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(object, be at kitchen)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(object, be at basement)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tape, stick paper with wall)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(object, be at kitchen)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tape dispenser, be used to bathroom wall)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(object, be at basement)