tape: be at drawer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adhesive tape
Weight: 0.70
, magnetic tape
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.64
, evidence
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.60
Siblings scotch tape
Weight: 0.75
, duct tape
Weight: 0.62
, tape measure
Weight: 0.37
, tape dispenser
Weight: 0.37
, videotape
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at drawer 1.00
be at desk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at drawer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be at desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tape dispenser, be at drawer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(scotch tape, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, be at desk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(tape dispenser, be at desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(tape, be at drawer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tape, be at drawer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tape, be at drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be at drawer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be at desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tape, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be at desk)