tape: be called masking tape

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.64
, evidence
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.60
Siblings scotch tape
Weight: 0.75
, duct tape
Weight: 0.62
, tape measure
Weight: 0.37
, tape dispenser
Weight: 0.37
, videotape
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called masking tape 1.00
be called tape 0.83
be called liquid tape 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be called tape)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(duct tape, be called tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(duct tape, be called tape)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(tape, be called masking tape)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(tape, be called liquid tape)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tape, be called liquid tape)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tape, be called tape)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(tape, be called liquid tape)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tape, be called tape)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tape, be called liquid tape)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tape, be called tape)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tape, be called tape)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tape, be called masking tape)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tape, be called masking tape)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tape, be called masking tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(duct tape, be called tape)