tape: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.64
, evidence
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.60
Siblings scotch tape
Weight: 0.75
, duct tape
Weight: 0.62
, tape measure
Weight: 0.37
, tape dispenser
Weight: 0.37
, videotape
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality cost 0.82
has shape solid 0.79
be improved by technology more durable than original 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tape, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tape, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evidence, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(evidence, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tape, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tape, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tape, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tape, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tape, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(tape, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)