tape: is insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.64
, evidence
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.60
Siblings scotch tape
Weight: 0.75
, duct tape
Weight: 0.62
, tape measure
Weight: 0.37
, tape dispenser
Weight: 0.37
, videotape
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is insulator 1.00
is good insulator 0.98
is conductive 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, is good insulator)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, is insulator)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, is conductive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(duct tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(duct tape, is insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(duct tape, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(duct tape, is conductive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(duct tape, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(duct tape, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(tape, is insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tape, is good insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tape, is good insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tape, is good insulator)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tape, is good insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tape, is insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tape, is insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(duct tape, is conductive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(duct tape, is insulator)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tape, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(duct tape, is good insulator)