target: be popular with women

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular with women 1.00
be popular 0.82
is popular 0.82
be more popular 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(head, be more popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(face, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(face, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(face, is popular)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(head, be more popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(head, be more popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(target, be popular with women)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(target, is popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(target, is popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(target, is popular)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(target, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be popular with women)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(target, be popular with women)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(head, be more popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be popular with women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(face, is popular)