target: close

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
close 1.00
be in longmont closed 0.80
be in matteson closing 0.78
close stores 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(target, close)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(target, close)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(target, close)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(target, be in longmont closed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(target, close)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(target, be in longmont closed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(target, close)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(target, be in longmont closed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(target, close)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(target, be in matteson closing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(target, close)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(target, be in matteson closing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(target, close)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(target, be in matteson closing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(target, close)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, close stores)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(target, close)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(target, be in longmont closed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(target, close)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(target, close stores)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(target, close)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(target, be in matteson closing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(target, close)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(target, close stores)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(target, close)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(target, close stores)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(target, close)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(target, close)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(target, close)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(target, close)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(target, close)