target: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is expensive now 0.94
is expensive right now 0.86
is cheaper 0.85
is zero expensive 0.82
is cheaper online 0.80
is more attractive 0.77
be more expensive than walmart 0.76
be online cheaper than than store 0.76
is attractive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(target, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(option, is expensive now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(target, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is expensive right now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(target, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(target, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive now)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive right now)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive now)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(option, is cheaper)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive right now)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(synagogue, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(face, is more attractive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(face, is attractive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(target, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(option, is expensive now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(target, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is expensive right now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(target, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(target, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(synagogue, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(synagogue, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(face, is more attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(face, is more attractive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(face, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(face, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(target, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(target, be more expensive than walmart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(target, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(option, is expensive now)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is expensive right now)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(face, is attractive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(face, is more attractive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(synagogue, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(option, is expensive now)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is expensive right now)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(target, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)