tarsier: have big eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents primate
Weight: 0.66
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.38
, wildlife
Weight: 0.28
, bird
Weight: 0.26
Siblings bonobo
Weight: 0.36
, tapir
Weight: 0.35
, cassowary
Weight: 0.35
, orangutan
Weight: 0.35
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big eyes 1.00
has physical part eyes 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tarsier, have big eyes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tarsier, have big eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(tarsier, have big eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(tarsier, has physical part eyes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tarsier, has physical part eyes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tarsier, has physical part eyes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tarsier, have big eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tarsier, have big eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tarsier, have big eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)