tart: is tatin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.70
, recipe
Weight: 0.57
, sweet
Weight: 0.52
, pastry
Weight: 0.46
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.38
, flan
Weight: 0.37
, custard
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, sorbet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is tatin 1.00
be called anglaise 0.82
be called napoleon 0.81
is calld dessert 0.81
be called creme anglaise 0.79
be called tart 0.79
is dessert 0.78
is sherbert 0.78
be called dessert 0.78
be called tiramisu 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(dessert, is calld dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tart, is tatin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dessert, be called napoleon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tart, is tatin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(dessert, is dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tart, is tatin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dessert, be called dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tart, is tatin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dessert, be called napoleon)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(dessert, is dessert)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(dessert, is calld dessert)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(dessert, be called dessert)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be called napoleon)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be called dessert)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is calld dessert)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is dessert)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(custard, be called anglaise)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, is sherbert)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(custard, be called creme anglaise)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(flan, is dessert)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, be called tiramisu)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dessert, be called napoleon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tart, is tatin)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(dessert, is calld dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tart, is tatin)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(dessert, is dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tart, is tatin)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(dessert, be called dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tart, is tatin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(tiramisu, be called tiramisu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, be called tiramisu)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(sorbet, is sherbert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(sorbet, is sherbert)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(flan, is dessert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(flan, is dessert)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(custard, be called creme anglaise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(custard, be called creme anglaise)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(custard, be called anglaise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(custard, be called anglaise)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(tart, is tatin)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tart, be called tart)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, be called tart)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tart, be called tart)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(tart, be called tart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tart, is tatin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, is calld dessert)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dessert, is dessert)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dessert, be called dessert)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dessert, be called napoleon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sorbet, is sherbert)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tiramisu, be called tiramisu)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(flan, is dessert)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(custard, be called anglaise)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(custard, be called creme anglaise)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, is calld dessert)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dessert, is dessert)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dessert, be called dessert)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tart, is tatin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dessert, be called napoleon)