tas: be good at speedrunning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents show
Weight: 0.25
Siblings sherlock
Weight: 0.23
, katie
Weight: 0.23
, stella
Weight: 0.23
, greg
Weight: 0.23
, nova
Weight: 0.23

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good at speedrunning 1.00
be in great shape now 0.82
has quality good 0.82
be in great shape 0.80
is close awesome 0.80
be considered bad 0.77
be really cancelled 0.77
has quality bad 0.77
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(nova, be considered bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(greg, is close awesome)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sherlock, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nova, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(nova, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(katie, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sherlock, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(nova, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(nova, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(nova, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(nova, be considered bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(greg, is close awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(greg, is close awesome)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sherlock, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(sherlock, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sherlock, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sherlock, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(katie, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(katie, is best)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nova, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nova, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tas, be good at speedrunning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tas, be good at speedrunning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nova, be considered bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(greg, is close awesome)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sherlock, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(nova, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nova, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sherlock, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tas, be good at speedrunning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(katie, is best)