tasmania: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new zealand
Weight: 0.71
, place
Weight: 0.63
, island
Weight: 0.62
, state
Weight: 0.60
, country
Weight: 0.59
Siblings india
Weight: 0.35
, usa
Weight: 0.35
, england
Weight: 0.35
, argentina
Weight: 0.35
, central african republic
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
has state name 0.81
has state jobs 0.79
is cold state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(usa, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(usa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(usa, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(central african republic, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(central african republic, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tasmania, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tasmania, has state name)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(tasmania, is cold state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state name)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, is cold state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tasmania, has state name)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tasmania, is cold state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tasmania, has state name)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state jobs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tasmania, is cold state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(tasmania, has state jobs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tasmania, has state jobs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tasmania, has state jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tasmania, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(usa, has state state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(central african republic, has state state)