taste: be how perceived

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be how perceived 1.00
be perceived 0.89
is perception 0.77
be perception class 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(sensation, be perception class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(taste, be how perceived)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sensation, be perception class)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sensation, be perception class)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(sensation, be perception class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(taste, be how perceived)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(taste, be how perceived)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(taste, is perception)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(taste, is perception)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(taste, is perception)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(taste, is perception)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(taste, be how perceived)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(taste, be how perceived)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sensation, be perception class)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(taste, be how perceived) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sensation, be perception class)