taste: be in mouth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in mouth 1.00
be from mouth 0.99
come from mouth 0.95
comes from mouth 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(smell, be from mouth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(smell, comes from mouth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(smell, come from mouth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(smell, be from mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(smell, be from mouth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(smell, come from mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(smell, come from mouth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(smell, comes from mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(smell, comes from mouth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(taste, be in mouth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in mouth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(taste, be in mouth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(smell, be from mouth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(smell, come from mouth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in mouth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smell, comes from mouth)