taste: be linked to retail price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be linked to retail price 1.00
be x price 0.78
be linked to quality 0.78
is linked 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(quality, be x price)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(taste, be linked to retail price)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(quality, be x price)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(quality, be x price)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(smell, be linked to quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(quality, be x price)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(taste, be linked to retail price)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(smell, be linked to quality)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(smell, be linked to quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(taste, be linked to retail price)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be linked to retail price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(taste, be linked to retail price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(quality, be x price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smell, be linked to quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(taste, be linked to retail price)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(quality, be x price)