taste: depend much on smell

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
depend much on smell 1.00
depend on smell 0.98
affect smell 0.88
affect much taste 0.83
be affected by smell 0.83
smell 0.81
require ability to smell 0.80
affect taste 0.79
affect taste of food 0.77
affect everything 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(smell, affect taste of food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(texture, affect much taste)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(smell, smell)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(texture, affect taste)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(smell, affect taste)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(texture, affect much taste)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(texture, affect much taste)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(smell, smell)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(smell, smell)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(smell, affect taste)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(smell, affect taste)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(texture, affect taste)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(texture, affect taste)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(smell, affect taste of food)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(smell, affect taste of food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(taste, depend much on smell)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(taste, depend on smell)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(taste, depend on smell)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(taste, depend on smell)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(taste, affect smell)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(taste, be affected by smell)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, depend much on smell)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(smell, smell)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(texture, affect much taste)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(smell, affect taste)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(texture, affect taste)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taste, depend much on smell)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smell, affect taste of food)