taxonomy: help scientists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.58
, field
Weight: 0.56
, information
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recursion
Weight: 0.32
, computer database
Weight: 0.32
, ontology
Weight: 0.32
, directory
Weight: 0.31
, indexing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
help scientists 1.00
was about core determined by scientists 0.85
assist biologists 0.83
was about inner core determined by scientists 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(information, was about inner core determined by scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxonomy, help scientists)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(information, was about inner core determined by scientists)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(information, was about inner core determined by scientists)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(information, was about inner core determined by scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, help scientists)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(taxonomy, help scientists)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(taxonomy, assist biologists)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, assist biologists)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, assist biologists)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taxonomy, assist biologists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, help scientists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxonomy, help scientists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(information, was about inner core determined by scientists)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxonomy, help scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(information, was about inner core determined by scientists)