taxpayer: pay price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.60
, citizen
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.55
Siblings public servant
Weight: 0.33
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, homeless person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
pay price 1.00
pay more 0.85
need pay 0.84
pay taxes 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(citizen, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(taxpayer, pay price)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(individual, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(taxpayer, pay price)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(individual, pay taxes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(citizen, pay taxes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(individual, pay taxes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(citizen, pay taxes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(citizen, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, pay price)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(individual, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, pay price)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(taxpayer, pay price)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, pay more)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, pay taxes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, need pay)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(taxpayer, need pay)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, need pay)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(taxpayer, pay taxes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(taxpayer, pay more)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(taxpayer, need pay)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, pay taxes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, pay more)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(taxpayer, pay taxes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(taxpayer, pay more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, pay price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(taxpayer, pay price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(individual, pay taxes)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(citizen, pay taxes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(individual, pay taxes)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(taxpayer, pay price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(citizen, pay taxes)