teaspoon: be at silverware drawer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.50
, device
Weight: 0.41
, piece
Weight: 0.40
, volume
Weight: 0.39
Siblings tablespoon
Weight: 0.47
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.32
, salad bowl
Weight: 0.31
, butter knife
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at silverware drawer 1.00
be at cutlery drawer 0.84
be at drawer 0.83
be at kitchen drawer 0.82
be at cupboard 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(utensil, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(utensil, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(utensil, be at drawer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(utensil, be at cupboard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be at drawer)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be at cupboard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tablespoon, be at silverware drawer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tablespoon, be at drawer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tablespoon, be at kitchen drawer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(salad bowl, be at cupboard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(utensil, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(utensil, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tablespoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tablespoon, be at silverware drawer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tablespoon, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tablespoon, be at drawer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tablespoon, be at kitchen drawer)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tablespoon, be at kitchen drawer)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(salad bowl, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(salad bowl, be at cupboard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at kitchen drawer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(teaspoon, be at kitchen drawer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(teaspoon, be at kitchen drawer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(teaspoon, be at kitchen drawer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(utensil, be at drawer)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(utensil, be at cupboard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tablespoon, be at silverware drawer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tablespoon, be at drawer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tablespoon, be at kitchen drawer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(salad bowl, be at cupboard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(utensil, be at drawer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(teaspoon, be at silverware drawer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(utensil, be at cupboard)