technician: has inheritance training

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nurse
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.60
Siblings installer
Weight: 0.59
, supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, salesman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has inheritance training 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(job, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(technician, has inheritance training)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(technician, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(job, has inheritance training)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(technician, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(job, has inheritance training)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(job, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(technician, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(technician, has inheritance training)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(technician, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(technician, has inheritance training)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(technician, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(technician, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(technician, has inheritance training)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(technician, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(technician, has inheritance training)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(technician, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(job, has inheritance training)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(technician, has inheritance training)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(job, has inheritance training)